Mole in Manmohan’s PMO
No Sec 302 IPC against person who murders wife having affair then what charge will be on Congress? Sonia & Natwar Strategy seems to ‘Swim or Sink’ together. Toga far fight is on between stalwarts.
The report leaked even before it could come to the House. Pathak Committee submitted its report to the PMO. Jagat Singh and his father Natwar Singh suspected the leakage from PMO.
The government was accused in Parliament of having leaked to media 'select' portions of the Report, supposedly indicting former External Affairs Minister K Natwar Singh, but giving the Congress Party a clean chit..
PMO said there is no leak from its office. Mr P Chidambaram and P R Dasmunsi said that Government has not leaked the report. In the beginning Govt. sources tried to blame Pathak Committee for the leakage. But Justice Pathak, a former Judge of the International Court of Justice, said there was no leak of the report at his end.
The report has been leaked. It means there is a mole in PMO who leaked the report. Now will Manmohan Singh ask Jaswnt for giving the name of the mole in his PMO? There was nuke leakage in Indira Gandhi to Narsimha Rao’s PMOs. Now mole in Manmohan’s PMO. Here There is a charge that PM Manmohan Singh is any how wants to sign US-India nuke deal due to the suspected nuke scientists’ bureaucrats. Even so many NRI are lobbying for the US-India nuke deal to kill India’s weapons program gets killed.
No Sec 302 IPC then what against Congress
When Parliament is in session why did they leak the report?
Before leaking matter came in loud, Congress Party spokesman Abhishek Singhvi boasted, "The report is there for anyone to see. It is a very high-powered commission chaired by a former Chief Justice of India." Congress and its President tried to wash hands to show leaked portion in Congress “hand” as clean chit. This is clear indication not only of the leakage but also the intention behind this leak. Congress has murdered secrecy with intention to save itself which is greater sin than leakage for money.
No Sec 302 IPC against person who murders wife having affair
Zeenews today reported: The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court has ruled that Section 302 of the IPC cannot be used against a person who murders his wife who has an extramarital affair, despite repeated warnings and requests. Justice M Chockalingam and Justice A Selvam, constituting the bench, held that the act of the accused would amount to culpable homicide under Section 304(I)of IPC and modified the conviction of a man, Babu, (life sentence under Section 302 of the IPC) to seven years rigorous imprisonment. The judges referred to the argument of the accused that the panchayatdars had forced him to live with his wife, who continued to have an illicit relationship with another man, though she had a child through Babu. The circumstances would prove that the act of the accused did not fall under the ambit of murder, the judges held. The crime had followed provocation by the deceased. The offence would attract only 304 Part I of the IPC. It is enough to award seven years RI for Babu, they said.
Sonia & Natwar Strategy seems to ‘Swim or Sink’ together
If nuke secrets can be given to US then why not Pathak report can be leaked from PMO?
Seriousness is here that Govt. itself leaked selected potion of Pathak committee’s report. This leak portion is related to save Sonia to save Congress to make Natwar a scapegoat. This is general tendency that small fishes are being caught to same big fish.
.
Sonia Gandhi, in the past said she would not spare any colleague linked to the scandal exposed by former US Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker. Leak portion of Pathat Report says that Natwar Singh and his son misused their position in OIL for Food deal. Natwar’ explaination is nearer to that if his introductory letter to Sehagal and Aditya khanna are treated as misusing the authority then how Sonia Gandhi can be free because of her letters addressed to Saddam and given to him? Natwar Singh has maintained that he and his Congress Party were inseparable. He had gone to then Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein only with a letter from the party president Sonia Gandhi, the party decided to play it cool.
Toga far fight between stalwarts of Congress
Natwar vows to tell oil tales in House. Daring the Congress, former Foreign Minister Natwar Singh today said he had lots to disclose and if pushed to the wall, he would spill the beans ''at a proper time'' and when the occasion arose.
Barely half-an-hour after Singh went on air with his revelations, Sonia's political secretary Ahmed Patel who was treasurer of Congress at the time of Oil for Food scam said the Congress president had nothing to be defensive about the letter. "It was a letter that conveyed goodwill message. Several delegations travelling abroad carry letter from the party president carrying such messages. It was not an introductory letter for Natwar to Saddam. It did not ask Saddam to give oil coupons to Natwar," Patel said.
Seeking to turn the tables on Singh, Patel said, “Before making any allegation against Soniaji, political parties should compare the three letters written by Natwar to Saddam and the one by the Congress president.”
Sri Prakash Jaiswal said: "Even if anyone goes out of the party, there is no affect on the health of the party. In the last 60 years, so many have come and gone and Congress remained unaffected by any threats,"
Natwar had said, “The only strength I had was the Congress party. So how can the Congress party and I be divorced.”
Canada’s Liberal party & Sonia’s Congress
In Canada Ralph Goodale's office (or the PMO) felt it was appropriate to use the power of the government to protect and preserve the fortunes of the Liberal Party. They did this.
Ralph Goodale was Canada's Minister of Finance from 2003 to 2006 and continues to be a Liberal Member of Parliament. There RCMP started to investigate possible leaking illegal activities by Ralph Goodale's office.
Despite the RCMP investigation many Canadians are doubtful that any prosecutions will result. Indeed, stock in the RCMP is at an all time low following their failure to lay any substantive charges in the largest corruption scandal in Canadian history and for failing to charge Liberals for attempting to bride Conservatives to vote a certain way in parliament despite incontrovertible evidence.
In India’s present crisis question arises: Is the Justice Pathak committee report a white- wash? Inquiry committees are famous in our country for one reason: Nothing substantial ever comes of them. Here we can call corrupt acts of Buta Singh and Sibu Soren in Narsimha Rao’s Govt. MM was also finance minister at that time.
Goodale won re-election to the House of Commons handily in the general election on January 23, 2006, but lost his cabinet position with the Liberal defeat. Here we ca say that Sonia and his son can win their constiuencies with few others with congress defeat overall.
By Premendra Agrawal
Related articles: in my blogs
Oil for Food: Palmist reads Congress “Hand”
Rule of corrupt dynasties
Where are letters of Congress President?
Natwar Singh was a scape goat to save Congress
Oil Scam: Truck loaded gold bars sold in India
Oil For Food: After natwar who should resign?
Oil Dacoit AWB Imports Wheat for us
Latest Articles:
http://news.indiainfo.com/2006/07/29/2907indira-rao-mole.html
Mole: Indira to Rao all the way
http://www.indolink.com/displayArticleS.php?id=072506013715
PMO War room leak & Bofors
www.hvk.org/articles/0706/main.html
http://www.indolink.com/displayArticleS.php?id=071606045252
SIMI & Secular Politics
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home