Soren became murderer due to Congress

Tags: Life imprisonment Congress Shibu Soren Congress CBI Shashikant Jha Christian Missonary JMM Bribe Scam Secular UPA Jharkhand Tribal Narsimha Rao Constitution Art 105


Shibu Soren got life imprisonment. Reason is bribe given by Congress. CBI to please Christian Govt to insult Ramayan argued today in Delhi Court that Soren was a conspirator as Jai Chand & Vibhishan.

The court directed that the fine amount of Rs five lakh, Rs 1 lakh will go to the victim's mother Priyamvada Jha and Rs 2 lakh each will be distributed to his two daughters. Secular Govt gives 7 lacs to each victim of Gujarat to make distance with the families of burnt karsevaks at Godhara in Sabarmati Express. Secular heart could not touch the families of the brutally murdered Sikhs in 1984 Anti-Sikh riot. It could not dare to give monetary support to the family of the murdered Shashikant Jha, though the court did this today.

Congress is totally responsible for the disaster of Shibu Soren. Soren is a tribal leader. He is not clean shaved. Political underworld don Congress forced him to be a member of its gang. He confused after taking bribe. He said in the praise of Christian Missonaries that they convert tribal of four legs into the tribal of two legs. By giving money and using force of other sources Christian Missionaries Convert most tribal in the Christianity. Congress made them fool by giving bribe in the exchange of votes to save the Congress government headed by Narsimha Rao.

Sonia led Congress led UPA government’s main target was Hinduism. To day we see this in the argument of CBI which is constituted under the PMO. CBI argued today in the Delhi Court that Soren was a conspirator as Jai Chand and Vibhishan. Ram Bhakt Vibhishan is compared to Jai Chand by this half Christian Governmentl. This issue will be discussed separately in another article.

In 1993 Congress was ruling in the centre by a thin majority. Opposition was declared for bringing the No-Confidence motion against the Rao Government. All opportunist leaders including Buta Singh, Bhajanlal and Vidhya Charan Shukla gathered to save the Congress Govt. They bargained the leaders of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha for ‘Bribe in the exchange of votes in the support of Congress’. The same tact is of Christian Missionaries in converting the tribal. They proposed 50-60 lacs bribery to every supporting parliamentarian of JMM. These JMM MPs accepted the proposal.
Even in the parliament one briber MP said that he received only 10, 3 lacs still remained unpaid.

One bribe taker entered the house of a minister to say that thieves are following him and he could not know how he save this huge money. Later on the suggestion of that minister that money was kept in the Nairoji City branch of Punjab and National Bank in many installments.

As reported on Aug 4, 2000 witness said: The bribe money allegedly paid to the JMM MPs (Suraj Mandal) in the Members of Parliament bribery case was deposited at a Delhi bank in July 31, 1993 , a prosecution witness(Jawahar Lal) told the court hearing the case today. Jawahar said that on reaching Suraj Mandal’s residence, they were handed over two suitcases (withdrawing it from a Bangalore branch of Canara Bank) containing currency notes by Mr Mandal, which they brought back to the bank in his van. They were followed by another official of the bank in a separate car who brought cash in two bags. Jawahar stated that the bags were taken to the bank manager’s cabin where the money was taken out and counted (currency notes of Rs 500, 100 and 50 denominations).

Soren has been convicted because all this — including the fact that he took money from Narasimha Rao’s men in July 1993 just about the time when the Rao government was almost falling but was saved because Soren and other JMM MPs voted for him in the Lok Sabha — was established before the sessions judge.

In Indian democracy no one has right to punish Congress for capturing power to rule by giving bribe. And yet, there is no way to prosecute him and try him on a charge of subverting democracy by facilitating an extended life for the Narasimha Rao government beyond July 1993. If Soren had not voted against the motion then (and voted in the manner he did only after he was paid off), the government would have fallen then and there. It survived until May 1996! This, indeed, was a case of subversion and a more heinous crime than murder done by Congress.

Congress has amended Indian Constitution more than 100 times. It is ready to make the law for inclusion of the tainted leaders in the cabinet. Sachchar Committee even recommended for making IAS in madarsas to govern the country, though Musharraf is being forced for bombing on madarsas. Congress led government has passed the Office of Profit Bill to save Somnath Chatterjee and others. It abolished the POTA to give free hand to terrorists and their supporters. It can do all to be in power. It can’t live without power as fish can’t live without water.

Appearing for the petitioners, Raja Ram Pal and others in the `cash for
query' scam Mr. Jethmalani argued that the freedom of speech of the MPs was wider than the right to freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution.

He said that unlike certain restrictions under Article 19, the rights of a member of Parliament under Article 105 of the Constitution (powers, privileges etc. of the Houses of Parliament and of the Members and Committees thereof) could not be subjected to any such restriction.

Mr. Jethmalani said that the apex court had recognised this right in the JMM bribery case and laid down that under Article 105 no member could be punished for any speech made in the House or the casting of vote by a member. He said the apex court had let off the bribe-takers because of this privilege though the bribe amount in that case was much more than what the 11 MPs were alleged to have received for raising questions in Parliament.

It means right of a member who had been elected was to remain for the duration of the House. These rights were statutory and constitutional. Only statutory and constitutional provisions could bring about termination or extinction of these rights. Article 102 provided for disqualification of members and it would be open to Parliament to provide a clause under this Article that a member would be disqualified if found guilty by the House to which he belonged of conduct unworthy of a member of Parliament.

In its more than 50 years rule, Congress never think about the Article 105. Because of this Narsimha Rao Government could be saved by the Congress by giving bribe which has already been pooved and because of taking bribe Soren is pushed in the political death well by Congress.

Congress is responsible totally for the disaster of Shibu Soren. The facts in the Soren case bring this to the fore. Soren’s career graph shows he has always been a rebel. The rebellion in him was ignited when at the instigation of a money lender, his father, Shobaran Soren, was murdered. Soren could not bear the loss. He vowed to get his region freed of the "tyrants" and initially his slogan was "Jharkhand ko soshan se mukti doo" (free Jharkhand from exploiters). Subsequently, the movement gave rise to JMM. Soren became the torchbearer of the struggle.

The 1960s saw the exploitation of tribals touching a new high with money lenders, landgrabbers, landlords, businessmen and forest mafia getting foothold in the coal and mica belts and bringing with them all the vices. They plundered the forests, seized the land of adivasis and desecrated the rivers.

Rose from the midst of maltreatment of tribals, Shibu took up cudgels against the tyranny of exploiters. He organised mining workers, dalits, backward classes under one banner and posed a challenge to the mafia. He soon came to be known as "jungle leader" and "tribal crusader". With the murder of Soren’s father, the struggle gathered momentum. Since then, Shibu Soren had only one-point mission — to get a separate state of Jharkhand.

By Premendra Agrawal
www.newsanalysisindia.com