Intelligent way to fool nation of 100 crores

Is Attorney-General Banerjee have given a clean chit to Navin Chawla, saying Mr.Chawla had commeted misconduct when he was a bureaucrat? Should PM Dr.Singh follow his innervoice or voice of Super PM?

Banerjee further said,” Chief Election Commissioner to recommend the removal of one of the Commissioners would arise only in the event of proven "misconduct" as Election Commissioner.” He forgot that President Kalam referred the matter of Mr. Chawla to PM instead of EC. Learned Banerjee intelligently avoided saying that at the time of appointment as EC, Mr.chawla was IAS officer in Inforamation Ministry and appointment was made by PM Dr.Singh himself. So PM has right to dismiss the appointment, which he made earlier. If God can give birth to us then he has also write to take back of our life.

“CHARGESHEETER EXAMINES CHARGESHEETER
Appointment of Chawla was cleared by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and has been approved by President A P J Abdul Kalam. This is irony that Honorable President has sent the complaint back to the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh who now remains non-committal on the NDA petition demanding removal of Election Commissioner Navin Chawla. PM has been forced to appoint Chawla as EC, and then what will be the fate of memorandum, every body knows.”

I have written the above truth on my news article and blog on April 1, 2006, titled:
NEXT ELECTION UNDER WORSHIPER OF FALSE GODS
/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?cid=45953
I did not make April fool to write above article on April 1, but as usual Congress, UPA, PM and Congress President made fool to us openly shamelessly. Readers may find the facts in today’s news published in every newspaper.

I am an ordinary citizen, obtained ‘LL.B’ degree in 1967 and practiced for ten years as Taxation Adviser. I shall be pleased to receive comments on the decision of Attorney-General Milon K. Banerjee which is as following:

“Attorney-General Milon K. Banerjee is understood to have given a clean chit to Navin Chawla, saying he has not committed any "misconduct" as Election Commissioner warranting his disqualification or removal. In his opinion sent to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Mr. Banerjee was reported to have said whatever allegations of "misconduct" pertained to the period Mr. Chawla was a bureaucrat and not during his current tenure as Election Commissioner. The constitutional provision empowering the Chief Election Commissioner to recommend the removal of one of the Commissioners would arise only in the event of proven "misconduct" as Election Commissioner. In this case, as all the allegations against Mr. Chawla pertained to his functions as a bureaucrat, the question of his disqualification did not arise,”

I did not find difference between the Banerjee Commission’s report on ‘Gadhara case” and this honorable Attorney-General Milon K. Banerjee’s report.

As I reported in my news articles in the past that Banerjee Commission said what lalu said in the parliament before the appointment of Banerjee Commission.

Now I have no ‘Lallo chappo’ to say that Attorney-General Milon K. Banerjee now said what mr.Chawla said before few days which is as following which may also find in my blog mentioned above.
“"Till the date that I was appointed as Election Commissioner on 16.05.2005, I was governed by the All India Service Conduct Rules, to which I abided in letter and spirit. Since my appointment as Election Commissioner, no political functionary or any other individual has contributed to this Trust or to The Lepra India Trust of which my wife Mrs. Rupika Chawla is Chairperson.”

Probably Attorney-General Milon K. Banerjee and Mr Chawla aceepted the truth to say that Mr.Chawla had commeted misconduct when he was a bureaucrat not after the appointment as Election Commissioner.

The above response is both irrelevant and irresponsible. The moot question is whether before his appointment as Election Commissioner, he was a private citizen or a member of the IAS. If he was a member of the IAS, then he was very much governed by the All India Services Conduct Rules and as per these rules, any collection of unauthorised money unconnected with one's official duty from any member of the public or any organisation is prohibited. But painful truth is that, right from day one of his entry into the IAS, he was exempted from all rules under the All India Services, first by Indira Gandhi, then by Sanjay Gandhi, again by Indira Gandhi and subsequently by Rajiv Gandhi and now Sonia Gandhi.

I had read law of Natural Justice when I was a student. Is above argument digestable as per law and as per commonsense? Sin is sin. ‘Who did it and when did it’ it may be said later.

Suppose Sonia Gandhi was corrupt prior to Presidentship of Congress. Does she become ‘Mother Superior’ after taking presidentship of Congress? But this is being happened.
My Dear Brothers ‘This is our India’.

What is a superior intelligent way to make fool nation of 100 crores. I have no wonder because ‘British India Company’ had made slave to us like that.

President did not want the decision on Mr.Chawla from the Election Commission. Secondly Chief Election Commissioner already made his opinion in the press conference that he would look the matter of Mr.Chawla if President desired so.
But President sent the matter to PM Dr.Singh.

As a literate citizen I feel pain when highest personalities making fool intelligently to us like that.

Why Mr. Chawla’s case is before PM Dr.Singh instead of Election Comission?
Why there is delay in taking decision on Somnath Chatterjee and others by Election Commission?

Why Election Commission became hurry to take decision promply on the matter of Jaya Bachchan? Why the same spirit absent now?

Secondly:
On whose advice President Kalam wrote a Kalam to Manmohan Singh that he should himself look the matter of Chawla? We are asking this because this type of decision is being taken one by one now. UPA Govt. took signature for announcing President Rule in Bihar, in the mid night when President was out of India. Our President is world known Sciencist but unknown about dirty politics of Congress.

If this is done because of the appointment given to Mr.Chawla by PM, then why not same basis could not be made for Parliamentarians and Loksabha Speaker?

The Prime Minister sought the AG's opinion after President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam forwarded to him a memorandum signed by 205 MPs of the National Democratic Alliance demanding the removal of Mr. Chawla. The Opposition MPs contended that trusts he and his family were associated with had received funds from Congress MPs from their local area development scheme. They urged the President to refer the matter to the Chief Election Commissioner, who under the Constitution could recommend the removal of an Election Commissioner.

Today again NDA meets President APJ Kalam in this regard.


Premendra Agreawal
Premendra_in@indiatimes.com
www.commercialservices.in/