comindia

Sunday, December 17, 2006

Afzal speaks in the parliament

Tags: Home Minister Shivraj Patil Jaiswal Save Afzal Vote is God Parliament Suicide bomber Rajiv Assasination IPKF Vaidya Indira Reservation Gandhi Unity India Muslim Appeasement Christian Indo US Nuke Deal;
Shivraj Patil connected Attack on Parliament to the assaination of Rajiv Gandhi and Afzal Guru to the killers of Rajiv Gandhi. Who wants to hang Supreme Court order? Should Afzal speak in parliament? Who are suicide bombers and terrorists to kill the safety and unity of India in and outside parliament?
Sending IPKF was a disaster
Computer-revolution was the gift given by Rajiv Gandhi. But his policy towards Sri Lanka in the last stage by sending Indan peace keeping force IPKF to Sri Lanka was controversial which hurt the sentiments of lakhs and lakhs Tamils of not only Sri Lanka but also of India. And unfortunate assasination happened. Every one condemned that and many might condemn sending of Indian Peace Keeping Force IPKF to Sri Lanka against Tamils in Jafna of Sri Lanka.

Save Afzal: Vote is God
First step: Under a planned conspiracy ‘Save Afzal’ move is going on to divide the religious unity of India for gaining votes in the coming assembly elections of five provinces.

Supreme Court verdict of hanging Afzal came in August 2005. UPA, its allies and Anti-Indianess elements remarkable step is to make atmosphere for hanging the Supreme Court order instead of hanging the Afzal as per SC order. Just after that Congress CM of J&K started move to save Afzal. Slowly and slowly as per fake secular planning others joined the move. Congress allies Mufti Sayeed’s PDF, Shard Pawar’s NCP, Lalu’s RJD and others jouned the move alongwith noutside supporter CPM. So called, foreign funded human activists, NGOs, Narabada Bachao Andolan and others pushed the move to evoke sentiments of Muslims. Even Farooq Abdulla of national Conferense threatened the Supreme Court judges. All these fake seculars including UPA government demanded mercy for Afzal but not by Afzal in writing. Afzal’s wife went with his child to meet president. President met them alongwith a lady lawyer Haskar who is also publicized as human activists. She never said that Kashmir is the part of India.

Second Step: After evoking the sentiments of Muslims second step of the mercy seekers are to guide Afzal for presenting written mercy appeal before the President. This was done to appease minority and for getting votes in the coming assembly election of five provinces. I myself have written an article for that at that time and asked the question regarding this.

Third Step: Now as per preplan third step Mohammad Afzal, who faces death for his role in the terror attack on parliament five years ago, filed a curative petition in the Supreme Court for settomg aside the punishment awarded to him in August 2005. This could not be done when Supreme Court passes order. Knowingly according to planning delay is created. I don’t discuss here about this move.

Fourth Step: A book has been published according to the planning of fake seculars to say that Afzal Guru was not involved in attacking the symbol of democracy. According to the book security agencies created a fake attack on the parliament. This is not the new policy of the fake seculars and their government. Railway Minister Lalu Yadav gave statement to the lok Sabha relating to burnt Sabarmati Express at Godhara. After that he appointed Banerjee Commission. The Commission said what lalu said in the parliament. According to them, ‘karsevaks’ of the train compartment burnt themselves.

Fifth Step:

(1)
In fifth step knowingly or unknowingly Home Minister has said in the parliament on Afzal issue which should not be said by a responsible Home Minister.
ON THE eve of the fifth anniversary of the December 13 attack on Parliament, Home minister Shivraj Patil, who undertook the task, asked the Opposition not to provoke relatives of the victims of the December 13 terror attack to mount pressure on the government for rejecting the clemency petition of Afzal.

Answer is in the following news:
Demanding Mohd Afzal's execution, families of the security men who died in the 2001 Parliament terror attack, returned the gallantry medals they had received in honour of the slain personnel to the Rashtrapati Bhavan as a mark of protest over the delay in carrying out the sentence. Accompanied by All India Anti-Terrorist Front (AIATF) chief M S Bitta on the fifth anniversary of the attack, they also expressed shock over Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil's remarks that they were being provoked by the BJP over the Afzal row.

"We did not order execution of Afzal. It's the court that has ordered it. But this vile politics over his death sentence, which is being delayed, has led us to return these medals," Ganga Devi, widow of sub-inspector Nanak Chand, said after emerging out of the presidential palace. They met the media holding a placard that contained photographs of all the slain security personnel. The families of the slain security men returned the medals to an official at the Rashtrapati Bhavan

Bitta loose his one leg in the attack of terrorisnt on him. He was a right hand of former Congress PM Narsimha Rao. He is not a member of any party of oppossion. The families of martyrs are also not the members of any political party. Then on what basis Home Minister insulted them.
Shivraj Patil has both legs. Perhaps he is not a member of those families of martyr. Patil was also one who was saved by the brave soldiers of above said families at the time of attack on the parliament. Brave soldiers did their job. Should Fake secular government behave like that?

(2)
The home minister, who began his reply by referring to the procedural format - the mercy petition is assessed by various arms of the government like the home and law ministries - said that swift action on demand for rejection of clemency could "divide the country." Although the minister did not elaborate on how the demand for rejection of clemency to a terror accused would divide the society
How does ‘Seeking mercy for Afzal’ become medium of unity? How does ‘swift action on demand for rejection’ become the medium to divide the country? Who threatened PM by email in Keral and there after plane hijacking for Afzal?
When BJP members said the Gen Vaidya murder case was decided very quickly, the Home Minister retorted citing the the decision on mercy plea in the Rajiv Gandhi case.
Above move in the parliament Shivraj Patil to fulfill appesement policy connected Attack on Parliament to the assaination of Rajiv Gandhi and Afzal Guru to the killers of Rajiv Gandhi. Vote is God for Congress Leaders.

At the moment there is no election in Tamil Nadu. So Tamils are zero for them.

They want Muslim votes through the friendship with Pakistan its sponsored terrorists by Joint Mechanism to appease Muslims.

They want Christian votes to accept any how Indo-Nuke Deal and to oppose the law against forcefull conversion to embrace forcefull conversion of tribals into Chiristianity.

They have divided Hindus by caste based reservation Quota fightback: AIIMS docs go on strike.

Further they want to divide India on religious basis to follow the ghost of Jinnah.

Natural and unnatural death both becomes the democratic weapon in the democracy due to sympathy wave. Sunil Dutt’s death was natural but unexperienced his daughter became MP due to sympathy wave. Assasianation (unnaturatl death) of Indira Gandhi pushed Rajiv Gandhi to be PM due to sympathy wave.

Loyal to Gandhi dynasty Congress leaders could not digest Narsimha Rao. In his rule Arjun Singh revolted in the sorrow of not becoming PM. He did not want second to PM. Though, he is now happy to bow before Sonia Gandhi. He and others bowed their heads before an Italian unexperienced woman to make her President of Congress. Ghost of BJP and fear of slipping Muslim votes forced Leftist parties, Mulayam’s Samajwadi Party, Lalu’s RJD and others willingly or not willingly accepted Sonia as a Chairperson of National Advisory Council. She could not be become PM due to the national sentiment but indirectly she is ruling as super PM.

Now Sonia Gandhi and its Congress are in double role. They are groomminging Rahul Gandhi for future PM and parralel to it they are trying to give credit for all good works to Sonia Gandhi. She is not responsible for evils of UPA. Reducing prices of petrol and diesel was due to Sonia Gandhi! 7 lakhs will be given to the Muslim victims of Gujarat riot on the advice of Sonia Gandhi!! Arjun Singh said the reservation be given to creamy layers also due to Sonia Gandhi. PM Manmohan Singh and others are resonsibel for all other controveersial works!!! This is the formula to project Sonia Gandhi also as a future PM. Like that two personalities of Fake Gandhi dynasty are being projected as PM post.

Indira Gandhi liberated Bangladesh from the cruelty of Pakistani dictators. She ws not killed by Pakistan army or its sponsored terrorist. Her assasination was executed by her body guard. Why? Every one knows who encouraged Bhindarwala in the starting. It is right she liberated Bangladesh. Atal Called her Durga at that time. Credit should be gone to Indira Gandhi. But her policy to capture the power in Punjab from united Akali to encourage Bhindarwala was wrong and that became the cause of her assasination unfortunately.

Like that computer-revolution was the gift given by Rajiv Gandhi. But his policy towards Sri Lanka in the last stage by sending Indan peace keeping force IPKF to Sri Lanka was controversial which hurt the sentiments of lakhs and lakhs Tamils of not only Sri Lanka but also of India. And unfortunate assasination happened. Every one condemned that and many might condemn sending of Indian Peace Keeping Force IPKF to Sri Lanka against Tamils in Jafna of Sri Lanka.

What was the fault the assainated General Arun Vaidya who followed the order of the then PM Indira Gandhi of democratic government? What is the fault of martyrs who defended the lives of all leaders who were in the parliament?

"Even the guilty and convicted have the constitutional right to defend and seek mercy of the President which Mohammad Afzal has done," State Home Mininster Sripraksh Jaiswal said on Dec 15. Have the CM of Congress and others in the government right to initiate move to ‘Save Afzal’?


By Premendra Agrawal
www.newsanalysisindia.com/

1 Comments:

  • Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen MP Asaduddin Owaisi on Sachar Committee Report in Parliament.

    ASADUDDIN OWAISI MP (HYDERABAD) : Thank you for giving me this opportunity. I rise to support the Bill that has been tabled in the august House. I have got some important points to bring to the notice of the august House.
    The Sachar Committee report has been tabled in this House. It clearly states the educational backwardness of the Muslim community. According to Sachar Report, there are 39 per cent OBCs and 0.8 per cent Scheduled Caste in the Muslim community.
    I support this Bill which provides reservation in Central Universities to SCs, STs and OBCs. However, I would like to know as to how fair it is to deny the benefits of reservation on the basis of religion, especially after the Government has tabled the Sachar Report in this august House which shows how bad my educational standards are and my conditions are.
    I would just like to quote one point here as far as the report is concerned. Page 73 of Sachar Report clearly says, “The percentage of population of graduates, as far as the Muslims are concerned, is 1.2 and those attending P.G. courses is 16.3.” It is lesser in Muslims than in dalits also. You are not implementing these minority universities over there. But why is it that I am being denied such benefits? Moreover, the Presidential Order of 1950 contravenes the basic fundamental rights given in the Constitution.
    How is it that only SCs belonging or professing the religion of Hinduism or Sikhism or neo Buddhism are being given reservation? Why not Dalit Christians and Dalit Muslims? This question has to be pondered over by the Government. I would request you sincerely, Sir, that the Government should come forward and ensure that the 1950 Presidential Order, Schedule III is amended. It says that only a person professing Hinduism or Sikhism or neo Buddhism can be classified as Schedule Caste. How is that possible? This Report of yours clearly says this. There is this argument about Muslims and OBCs. Why is it such a low percentage is there? This has to be looked into.
    Lastly, about Jamia Milia University, how is that the present Vice-Chancellor wants to implement this present Bill in Jamia Milia University? Why has the Vice-Chancellor overnight changed this position? Why are we being denied such benefits? I would request you that this issue has to be taken care of. They have applied to the National Minority Education Commission also. It is pending over there. If Jamia Milia University is not a minority University, then, which is a minority university? This is a very important question. These are important points I wanted to bring to the notice of the august House.
    I support this Bill. I hope that this UPA Government will take affirmative action and will not deny us reservation under Article 16(4). If people are opposed to reservations to Muslims, they should look into the pre-native history of Article 16(4). It is none other than Sardar Vallabhai Patel, who has stated `classes’ means `Minorities’. He was the Chairman of that Advisory Committee. Why are Muslims having reservations in Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka? Why can they not be given reservations nationwide? It has to be done. Literacy rate of 13 per cent of population is only 59. There is a huge difference between literate and educated persons. You can very well imagine 13 per cent of population with a literacy of 59 per cent. Hence, I would request that the Government should come forward with the proposal and I hope that the hon. Minister, when he stands up to reply would respond to this or this UPA Government has to amend 1950 Presidential Order. They have to take affirmative action under Articles 15(4) and 16(4).
    Thank you.

    By Blogger ALI, at 3:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home